practices

Archives: News

On April 24, 2020, Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued Executive Order 2020-59 (the “Order”), which extends the Stay-at-Home timeframe to May 15, 2020, and expands the universe of workers allowed to return to work outside the home. Key to the Order is the requirement that businesses with any employees working in-person (i.e., not remotely) must have in place a COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan (“Plan”), consistent with guidance previously issued by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA).  

Executive Order 2020-59 can be accessed here. We previously reported on key aspects that employers should consider in developing their COVID-19 Plan, which can be accessed here. 

While the newspaper headlines will focus on the return of lawn and gardening supplies at local stores, and Michiganders hitting the links now that the restrictions on golf have been relaxed, the key takeaway for business owners making preparations for re-opening their stores and offices is: What belongs in my COVID-19 Preparedness Plan? 

Considerations for preparing a COVID-19 Plan include: (1) assessing COVID-19 risks to employee health, including those relating to specific job functions and individual risk factors; and (2) identifying, documenting and implementing the appropriate controls. These will vary with the type of work performed and the location of the work. The Plan should be developed to assess and control COVID-19 related health risks for both “in-person” and “in-office” work. The COVID-19 specific employee training requirements must be tailored as appropriate for the services being provided by the business.

A Plan should outline the proper recording of workplace exposure events involving COVID-19. Per OSHA, employers are only responsible for recording cases of COVID-19 if all of the following are true:

1. The case is a confirmed case of COVID-19 (see CDC information on persons under investigation and presumptive positive and laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19); 
2. The case is work-related (as defined by 29 CFR 1904.5); and
3. The case involves one or more of the general recording criteria set forth in 29 CFR 1904.7 (e.g., medical treatment beyond first aid, days away from work).

Before issuing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), the following questions must be considered:

1. Is the appropriate PPE identified to be used by your employees for the task?
2.
Is employee training conducted and documented on the proper procedures and techniques for the use of that equipment? 
3. Is respiratory fit testing required?  

This is especially timely given that Executive Order 2020-59 requires that employers provide employees who perform in-person work with a non-medical grade face covering (at a minimum). Workplace safety also involves consideration of the proper disinfectants to minimize the risk of exposure to COVID-19 and the proper use and storage of such chemical agents. 

Within three weeks of the first presumptive positive COVID-19 case in Michigan, the attorneys at Foley, Baron, Metzger & Juip, PLLC have been developing company specific COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans for their clients. The FBMJ approach takes into account the unique sectors, workforce and work environments individual to their respective clients and tailors a Plan to meet that company’s specific needs. To help your company maintain compliance with the Governor’s Executive Order 2020-59, you may contact one of the attorneys listed below: 

Rich Baron rbaron@fbmjlaw.com 
Ben Fruchey bfruchey@fbmjlaw.com
Nick Tatro ntatro@fbmjlaw.com

April 2020

Governor Whitmer Mandates Employers Develop COVID-19 Preparedness Plans To Perform “In-Person” Work

On April 24, 2020, Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued Executive Order 2020-59 (the “Order”), which extends the Stay-at-Home timeframe to May 15, 2020, and expands the universe of workers allowed to return to work outside the home. Key to the Order is the requirement that businesses with any employees working in-person

April 2020

FBMJ Announces the Promotion of Six Attorneys to Partners

Foley, Baron, Metzger & Juip, PLLC, is pleased to announce promotions of six attorneys to partners, effective April 1, 2020. “We congratulate our new partners for having earned this well-deserved professional achievement through their hard work on behalf of our clients,” said Clyde Metzger, one of the founding partners of the

April 2020

Governor Whitmer’s New Stay-At-Home Order (Executive Order 2020-42) Has Legal Requirements for Business Owners to Fulfill Before Starting In-Person Operations

In addition to the Stay-at-Home provisions and exceptions in Governor Whitmer’s Executive Order 2020-42 which are outlined below, the Order requires business owners to address three legal requirements to conduct in-person operations. These are: (1) Preparation of a COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan consistent with OSHA guidance; (2) determine who,

March 2020

Executive Order 2020-21 (COVID-19) – What the Stay at Home Order Means for Michigan Citizens and Businesses

On March 23, 2020, Governor Whitmer issued a “stay-at-home” order titled Executive Order 2020-21 (“EO 2020-21”). The stated purpose of the Order is to assist in slowing the spread of novel Coronavirus COVID-19 and to protect the healthcare system from being overwhelmed. This article provides an overview of the Order

March 2020

Maintaining MIOSHA Compliance in the Rapidly Changing COVID-19 Environment

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, business owners, managers and executives may be wondering: 1. What are the employer’s responsibilities to keep employees safe from COVID-19? 2. Do I need to report to MIOSHA that an employee has been diagnosed with COVID-19? In this article, we address these questions with a focus on helping

March 2020

Michigan Supreme Court Issues Administrative Orders Affecting Courts and Cases During the COVID-19 Crisis

The Michigan Supreme Court has issued several Administrative Orders since the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis which impact the operations and procedures of courts and court cases across the State of Michigan. Administrative Order No. 2020-2: Limiting Activities/Assemblages in Michigan Courts On March 18, the Michigan Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued Administrative

March 2020

Essential Issues for Landlords to Consider in Response to COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting businesses across all sectors of the economy, and landlords are no exception. The most obvious challenge landlords face is the inability of tenants to pay rent due to the economic downturn, but there are other important issues that landlords must address related to their commercial

March 2020

FBMJ Takes Steps to Combat the COVID-19 Outbreak While Ensuring Continuity of Service

The COVID-19 crisis is impacting all of us in myriad ways. At Foley, Baron, Metzger & Juip, we are committed to helping our clients navigate through the challenges they are facing during these uncertain times. We are also taking steps to protect the safety of our attorneys and staff, as

March 2020

The Ol’ Expert Switcheroo: COA Holds AOM Signed by New Expert “Amendment” and Relates Back

If a plaintiff replaces an affidavit of merit (AOM) signed by an unqualified expert with one signed by a qualified expert, does the subsequent AOM constitute an “amendment” to the original AOM, such that it relates back for statute of limitations purposes? Surprisingly, yes—at least according to the Court of

March 2020

2020 Michigan Non-Economic Damages Caps

The State of Michigan Department of Treasury has announced the 2020 Non-Economic Damages Caps for medical malpractice claims. With respect to obtaining compensation for the injured plaintiff, Michigan has a statutory cap on the amount of noneconomic loss that a plaintiff may be awarded in a medical malpractice lawsuit. Noneconomic