practices

Archives: News

The Michigan Supreme Court has issued several Administrative Orders since the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis which impact the operations and procedures of courts and court cases across the State of Michigan.

Administrative Order No. 2020-2: Limiting Activities/Assemblages in Michigan Courts

On March 18, the Michigan Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued Administrative Order No. 2020-2, limiting assemblages and activities in courts across the State of Michigan. The order, which supersedes all previous actions taken by all Michigan courts on a local basis, comes in response to the growing COVID-19 crisis. The order is in effect until April 3, 2020.

The order applies to all circuit, district, and probate courts in Michigan. It provides that “courts are ordered to limit access to courtrooms and other spaces to no more than 10 persons, including staff, and to practice social distancing and limit court activity to only essential functions….” Similar actions, resulting in restricted courthouse access, continuing trials, cancelling non-case related activities, and rescheduling or permitting videoconferencing of oral arguments, have been taken in state and federal courts across the country in order to help stop the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

In the order, the Court outlines what it deems “essential functions” that can continue in the circuit, district, and probate courts, respectively. With respect to general civil and business court cases taking place in the circuit courts, which constitute the bulk of the cases our firm handles on behalf of clients, the essential functions that can proceed include infectious disease proceedings under MCL 333.5201 et seq., and limited proceedings regarding personal protection orders. All other civil and business court matters, including trials, must be conducted remotely using two-way interactive video technology or other remote participation tools or they must be adjourned until after April 3, 2020.

Until the order is lifted, courts have been instructed to work with county clerks to ensure that if in-person filing of court pleadings is limited due to the state of emergency, pleadings can be accepted for filing by other means, such as U.S. mail, e-Filing, email, or facsimile.

Administrative Order No. 2020-3: Extending Deadlines for Commencement of Actions

On March 23, the Court issued Administrative Order No. 2020-3, extending all deadlines applicable to the commencement of all civil and probate case-types. This order extends all deadlines pertaining to case initiation and the filing of initial responsive pleadings in civil and probate matters during the state of emergency declared by Governor Gretchen Whitmer related to COVID-19. The order does not preclude a court from ordering an expedited response to a complaint or motion in order to hear and resolve an emergency matter requiring immediate attention. It also does not prohibit or restrict a litigant from commencing a proceeding whenever the litigant chooses.

Administrative Order No. 2020-4: Suspending Filing Deadlines in the Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals

On March 26, the Court issued Administrative Order No. 2020-4, suspending, effective as of March 24, all filings, jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional, in the Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Filings will be tolled until the expiration of Governor Whitmer’s Executive Order 2020-21 (the stay-at-home order) or a subsequent executive order that extends the period in which citizens are required to suspend activities that are not necessary to sustain or protect life. Filers will have the same number of days to submit their filings after the executive order expires as they had before the suspension went into effect.

We are actively communicating with our clients to inform them regarding any delays in their cases due to administrative actions taken by the courts in light of the COVID-19 crisis, and will continue to do so moving forward.

March 2020

Michigan Supreme Court Issues Administrative Orders Affecting Courts and Cases During the COVID-19 Crisis

The Michigan Supreme Court has issued several Administrative Orders since the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis which impact the operations and procedures of courts and court cases across the State of Michigan. Administrative Order No. 2020-2: Limiting Activities/Assemblages in Michigan Courts On March 18, the Michigan Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued Administrative

March 2020

Essential Issues for Landlords to Consider in Response to COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting businesses across all sectors of the economy, and landlords are no exception. The most obvious challenge landlords face is the inability of tenants to pay rent due to the economic downturn, but there are other important issues that landlords must address related to their commercial

March 2020

FBMJ Takes Steps to Combat the COVID-19 Outbreak While Ensuring Continuity of Service

The COVID-19 crisis is impacting all of us in myriad ways. At Foley, Baron, Metzger & Juip, we are committed to helping our clients navigate through the challenges they are facing during these uncertain times. We are also taking steps to protect the safety of our attorneys and staff, as

March 2020

The Ol’ Expert Switcheroo: COA Holds AOM Signed by New Expert “Amendment” and Relates Back

If a plaintiff replaces an affidavit of merit (AOM) signed by an unqualified expert with one signed by a qualified expert, does the subsequent AOM constitute an “amendment” to the original AOM, such that it relates back for statute of limitations purposes? Surprisingly, yes—at least according to the Court of

March 2020

2020 Michigan Non-Economic Damages Caps

The State of Michigan Department of Treasury has announced the 2020 Non-Economic Damages Caps for medical malpractice claims. With respect to obtaining compensation for the injured plaintiff, Michigan has a statutory cap on the amount of noneconomic loss that a plaintiff may be awarded in a medical malpractice lawsuit. Noneconomic

February 2020

COA: Medicaid Lien Reimbursement Made Easy…

On February 4, 2020, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its published opinion in the matter of Theresa Byrnes, et al. v. Jacob Martinez, M.D., et al. This opinion provides much-needed guidance to attorneys and courts regarding the methods used to consider and implement when attempting to settle a lawsuit

February 2020

FDA Says CBD is Illegal to Market & Possibly Unsafe

FBMJ attorneys Kim Sveska and Eric Nordan co-authored “FDA Says CBD Is Illegal To Market And Possibly Unsafe” published in the January 2020 issue of Michigan Pharmacist. The article concentrates on the legal uncertainty of the cannabidiol (CBD) products market. “FDA Says CBD Is Illegal to Market and Possibly Unsafe” discusses

February 2020

Is Your Vape Safe?

According to the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC), as of January 21, 2020, 2,711 EVALI cases (e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury) or deaths have been reported to the CDC. There have been sixty (60) confirmed deaths in 27 states and the District of Columbia, including three (3) from

December 2019

Attorneys Baron, Cortez & Nordan Co-Author Article for CLM Magazine – “The Path Forward For Cannabis”

FBMJ attorneys Richard Baron, Daniel Cortez and Eric Nordan co-authored “The Path Forward For Cannabis,” published in the December 2019 issue of CLM Magazine. The article focuses on legal and regulatory developments in 2019 that signal clarity and confusion for insurers. “The Path Forward For Cannabis” discusses a look back at

December 2019

Attorneys Fruchey & Tatro Co-Author Article for MDTC Quarterly – “PFAS Litigation: An Overview of Cases, Claims, Defenses, Verdicts & Settlements”

FBMJ attorneys Benjamin Fruchey and Nicholas Tatro co-authored “PFAS Litigation: An Overview of Cases, Claims, Defenses, Verdicts & Settlements,” published in the December 2019 issue of Michigan Defense Quarterly, Volume 36, No. 2 – 2019. The article, as the title suggests, focuses on contamination cases involving Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances