practices

Archives: News

In addition to the Stay-at-Home provisions and exceptions in Governor Whitmer’s Executive Order 2020-42 which are outlined below, the Order requires business owners to address three legal requirements to conduct in-person operations. These are: (1) Preparation of a COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan consistent with OSHA guidance; (2) determine who, if any, qualify as critical infrastructure workers or for other exceptions, and (3) document in writing their decision. 

Considerations for preparing a COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan include: (1) assessing COVID-19 risks to employee health, including those relating to specific job functions and individual risk factors; and (2) identifying, documenting and implementing the appropriate controls. These will vary with the type of work performed and the location of the work. The Plan should be developed to assess and control COVID-19 related health risks for both “in-person” and “in-office” work. The COVID-19 specific employee training requirements are tailored as appropriate for the company.

The Order states that under MCL 30.405(3), willful violation of the Order is a misdemeanor, so deviating from the Order could result in serious consequences. The six-foot social distancing requirements remain in place. Other key provisions include:

1. General Stay-At-Home Requirement: All individuals living within the State of Michigan are ordered to stay at home or at their place of residence. Unless there is a stated exception in the Order, all other travel is prohibited.

a. The Order prohibits travel to second homes or vacation rentals, or advertising or renting a short-term vacation property except as necessary to assist in housing certain identified individuals helping in the response to the COVID-19 crisis. Per the FAQs, the Order also prohibits use of a motorboat, jet ski or similar watercraft (includes gas and electric motors), but non-motorized vessels are not prohibited.

b. Business Exceptions to Stay-At-Home Order (Non-exclusive list):

i. Those workers who are necessary to sustain or protect life 

1. Critical infrastructure workers outlined in federal guidance documents; 
2. Childcare workers under certain conditions;
3. Workers at suppliers, distribution centers, or service providers, including those further down the chain; 
4. Insurance industry workers if the work cannot be done remotely;
5. Workers and volunteers that provide food, shelter, and other necessities of life for economically disadvantaged or otherwise needy individuals;
6. Workers at retail stores who sell groceries, medical supplies, and products necessary to maintain the safety, sanitation, and basic operation of residences, including convenience stores, pet supply stores, auto supplies and repair stores, hardware and home maintenance stores, and home appliance retailers;
7. Workers at laundromats, coin laundries, and dry cleaners;
8. Certain workers at hotels and motels, with limited allowed operations;
9. Certain workers at motor vehicle dealerships; and 
10. Workers necessary to conduct minimum basic business operations, as defined in the Order.

ii. Retail store requirements: Include cordoning off certain areas, restrictions on occupancy, items being sold, square-footage restrictions, and others. 

c. Other exceptions (Non-Exclusive list):

i. Walking, hiking, running, cycling, kayaking, canoeing, or other similar activities.

ii. Travel (non-exclusive list):

1. To perform certain tasks necessary to protect the health and safety of family or household members (including pets);
2. To obtain certain necessary services or supplies for themselves, their family or household members, their pets, and their vehicles, using delivery services to the extent possible;
3. To care for a family member or their pet in another household, and certain other disadvantaged or at-risk individuals; 
4. To visit an individual under the care of a health care facility, residential care facility, or congregate care facility, to the extent otherwise permitted; 
5. To work or volunteer for businesses or operations (secular and non-secular) that provide food, shelter, and other necessities of life for the economically and otherwise disadvantaged, and people with disabilities, among others; 
6. To attend a funeral attended by no more than 10 people. 

FBMJ attorneys have experience with preparing the required COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans and guiding clients through the process of determining and documenting critical infrastructure workers and preparing Infectious Disease documentation.

For additional information on anything in this article, including assistance in documenting Executive Order 2020-42 compliance for in-person business operations, you may contact the attorneys below:

Rich Baron rbaron@fbmjlaw.com 
Ben Fruchey bfruchey@fbmjlaw.com
Nick Tatro ntatro@fbmjlaw.com

April 2020

Governor Whitmer’s New Stay-At-Home Order (Executive Order 2020-42) Has Legal Requirements for Business Owners to Fulfill Before Starting In-Person Operations

In addition to the Stay-at-Home provisions and exceptions in Governor Whitmer’s Executive Order 2020-42 which are outlined below, the Order requires business owners to address three legal requirements to conduct in-person operations. These are: (1) Preparation of a COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan consistent with OSHA guidance; (2) determine who,

March 2020

Executive Order 2020-21 (COVID-19) – What the Stay at Home Order Means for Michigan Citizens and Businesses

On March 23, 2020, Governor Whitmer issued a “stay-at-home” order titled Executive Order 2020-21 (“EO 2020-21”). The stated purpose of the Order is to assist in slowing the spread of novel Coronavirus COVID-19 and to protect the healthcare system from being overwhelmed. This article provides an overview of the Order

March 2020

Maintaining MIOSHA Compliance in the Rapidly Changing COVID-19 Environment

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, business owners, managers and executives may be wondering: 1. What are the employer’s responsibilities to keep employees safe from COVID-19? 2. Do I need to report to MIOSHA that an employee has been diagnosed with COVID-19? In this article, we address these questions with a focus on helping

March 2020

Michigan Supreme Court Issues Administrative Orders Affecting Courts and Cases During the COVID-19 Crisis

The Michigan Supreme Court has issued several Administrative Orders since the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis which impact the operations and procedures of courts and court cases across the State of Michigan. Administrative Order No. 2020-2: Limiting Activities/Assemblages in Michigan Courts On March 18, the Michigan Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued Administrative

March 2020

Essential Issues for Landlords to Consider in Response to COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting businesses across all sectors of the economy, and landlords are no exception. The most obvious challenge landlords face is the inability of tenants to pay rent due to the economic downturn, but there are other important issues that landlords must address related to their commercial

March 2020

FBMJ Takes Steps to Combat the COVID-19 Outbreak While Ensuring Continuity of Service

The COVID-19 crisis is impacting all of us in myriad ways. At Foley, Baron, Metzger & Juip, we are committed to helping our clients navigate through the challenges they are facing during these uncertain times. We are also taking steps to protect the safety of our attorneys and staff, as

March 2020

The Ol’ Expert Switcheroo: COA Holds AOM Signed by New Expert “Amendment” and Relates Back

If a plaintiff replaces an affidavit of merit (AOM) signed by an unqualified expert with one signed by a qualified expert, does the subsequent AOM constitute an “amendment” to the original AOM, such that it relates back for statute of limitations purposes? Surprisingly, yes—at least according to the Court of

March 2020

2020 Michigan Non-Economic Damages Caps

The State of Michigan Department of Treasury has announced the 2020 Non-Economic Damages Caps for medical malpractice claims. With respect to obtaining compensation for the injured plaintiff, Michigan has a statutory cap on the amount of noneconomic loss that a plaintiff may be awarded in a medical malpractice lawsuit. Noneconomic

February 2020

COA: Medicaid Lien Reimbursement Made Easy…

On February 4, 2020, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its published opinion in the matter of Theresa Byrnes, et al. v. Jacob Martinez, M.D., et al. This opinion provides much-needed guidance to attorneys and courts regarding the methods used to consider and implement when attempting to settle a lawsuit

February 2020

FDA Says CBD is Illegal to Market & Possibly Unsafe

FBMJ attorneys Kim Sveska and Eric Nordan co-authored “FDA Says CBD Is Illegal To Market And Possibly Unsafe” published in the January 2020 issue of Michigan Pharmacist. The article concentrates on the legal uncertainty of the cannabidiol (CBD) products market. “FDA Says CBD Is Illegal to Market and Possibly Unsafe” discusses